Cadmore media player playing video Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Peer-Review: Perspectives from a C4DISC-SSP Toolkit, a Major University, and a Scholarly Publisher
Video Player
Accessibility
Using forms mode, you can utilize keyboard shortcuts to make usability more efficient.
Space bar will play and pause the video. Pressing escape will close all displays and pressing it again will jump to the end of the player.
You can press A to open the Keyboard Shortcut Dialog which also provides an audio description of the player and all of its features.
Language
1x
Play Speed
Adjust Volume
Transcript
Search
Result Count
of
Click to jump to result
Search
Re-center
Segments
Result Count
of
Click to jump to result
Search
Name:
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Peer-Review: Perspectives from a C4DISC-SSP Toolkit, a Major University, and a Scholarly Publisher
Description:
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Peer-Review: Perspectives from a C4DISC-SSP Toolkit, a Major University, and a Scholarly Publisher
Thumbnail URL:
https://cadmoremediastorage.blob.core.windows.net/7b435479-47f5-4414-94f9-de979451b279/videoscrubberimages/Scrubber_1.jpg
Duration:
T00H58M21S
Embed URL:
https://stream.cadmore.media/player/7b435479-47f5-4414-94f9-de979451b279
Content URL:
https://cadmoreoriginalmedia.blob.core.windows.net/7b435479-47f5-4414-94f9-de979451b279/session_2b___equity%2c_diversity%2c_and_inclusion_in_peer-review.mp4?sv=2019-02-02&sr=c&sig=MozDbTpEO7CAay929cu4fymFX541wq0tdpW2ym48Ucg%3D&st=2025-04-29T21%3A09%3A15Z&se=2025-04-29T23%3A14%3A15Z&sp=r
Upload Date:
2024-12-03T00:00:00.0000000
Transcript:
Language: EN.
Segment:0 .
By imposing express's commission for this amazing innovation and inspiring. The monument was stolen. Although most journal editors and publishers recognized the value of being among the associate editors and editorial boards, it can be overwhelming to actually concentrate the editorial board or to a long established one.
And so those who have not been included. And if you need advice regarding the actions they can take to diversify their boards. This panel is really looking at the perspectives of all organizations that have recently developed interests or guidelines to ensure equity, inclusion and results and practical suggestions. So I'm Sally. I'm going to be covering the single distinguished authors winners of the SSP automated building and editorial roles and behavioral and focused on urban education policies.
And then Charlotte Rowe will talk about the scholarly communication website developed by the University of California, and Karen Schreier will talk about the same website, embracing the role of the reviewer and diverse, equitable, and basic user. So I just got quite an introduction. Audience and accreditations at the American Academy of neurology, where I oversee publication of applied neurology journals along with the Journal News tabloid and mainstream.
Pilot is a hesitations manager for University of California and collaborates with librarians and insertions of practice on campus using systems to manage the journal publishing program. Intern is a senior editor for The Sage Publishing on humanities and social sciences department. Managing and acquiring titles and economics of social science journals and unfolded the motifs.
So our cooking show, the slide is called ascendant when redsun today. And one more slide to remind everyone about core values. Until the drawing session by talking about the latest news with Newsweek August equity series that was released on Tuesday, May 7, on the Coalition for diversity in scholarly communications for infodisc website.
So this a purpose to pursue education services and editorial roles. And now he is always looking to build relationships. Editorial in rural communities as a student, be proud that this booklet included in the outreach subcommittee of the Ethics Committee. So Thanks again to the subcommittee members for all the volunteers with the time to utilize this valuable resource, and especially to Susan Harris and Sheila Lyons, who led the creation of the system.
And Susan is here. So it's amazing to me that stand up. Slavics welcome in this. The end result was just a fraction of an instant approval. Start of my journey in neurology on a path that subsequently led to personal workflow and translated.
It was a crowning ceremony in February 2003. There was a snowstorm later in the day and I was able to get a lot done because the building closed early. I had chosen a few main tasks. I had to get done that day and was scheduled for a number of meetings with staff. Before I go, self-examination, horribles that are confused about something that you studied and asked me to go to the website and read it.
Those are things imagining different experiences, questions that I had never seen. A section of emails, phones and other personal reflections of Americans that relate to their experiences in crisis. There's a chance looking for Sabhapati's incredible capacity across as we are seeing here. All the personal skills that are self-assertion present in the breath. Professores one.
All the memorized verses in verses. It is obvious that he was head of the Jews containing the racial stereotypes that are not aligned with our society, schools or anything else. There is a numerous one of hundreds of emails and many social media channels protesting this position. This fees, lack of discussion about communications with the society and decided the only way to restore accountability for the violence intended by resupplying a file with contrasting notices with no other information.
The article had no vestige of the article left behind. This is another example. Subsequently overwhelming to the membership of local societies in the South. Reprograms themselves for evil to and medical processes and forces so that nothing like this could ever happen again. And we announced that we would take steps to. In addition, this was the editorial that we wrote as rhinocerotis outlined how the responsibility for the possession of a brain by adding several diverse editors and crew over the language site, is the focus of the ad and provide a sensitivity to make style changes to ensure a successful violent language and increase the diversity of the editorial board and the team of special editors who will boost diversity in closed doors.
I'm hoping that this experience will never happen to any of you. At the time, five years ago, there were no general guidelines available implementing these changes. Just learning how to be done. A lot has happened in the past five years. Managing editors and publishers have become very overt, and the agency virgins were our boys, and they're looking for guidance. They had information and recommendations.
Raffinate editorial board members. We would have loved to have had the advice in the Navy SEAL dispirited after this incident or those first destroyed that we could have avoided it. The pamphlet recommends and subsequent relevant lessons for overseas inhabitants to take to create broad representation on editorial boards and to ensure fairness and utilization of bias in the hearing process.
I'm just going to give you a very brief preview today thing. There are five major recommendations reflected in this infographic that are explored in the system. Actions to develop uses. To initiate scraps or selecting or importing demographic data to guide goal setting and actions for increased diversity. The coolgardie.
Intentionally platon's participation of the marginalized communities and opportunities for students in rural schools and informal scholarship areas, and actions based on sources such as bias free language guidelines. More equitable will be methods to increase equity in the peer review process. Of course, initially we hired an artist because the attractive artwork for the scorpion and the frog, those are only possible with slicing the hell out of the roller coaster itself.
So I'm getting working this as well as the. OK Thank you. Recommendation one outlines actions to help develop an inclusive culture in motion. One of the first steps is an informal commitment called a Diversity Statement, and concluding Pettersson, along with an editorial committed to addressing more pervasive racism. This reckoning in the editorial board said writers representation is an orphan during the editorial process, and the first one, a dedicated associate magazine's editorial board members who use these notice for compliance language policies like data sharing and an access to resources to distribute and set rules and standards versus brain and azoteas.
Recommendation tools and steps for collecting and reporting demographic data. And those involved in the other purposes. The guide goal setting and subsequent matches to increase diversity. We'll want to gather baseline demographic data. One of the first challenges is deciding which trends, values and methods present in data tracking system. So the government had in mind that demographic data needs to be gathered in a way that respects privacy.
So having all gather, inclusive, transparent process of anonymized data and all is good as a bricklayer, so burfi is absolutely essential. So limit access necessary for public education is a terrible mental space to try out the reasons. Recommendation three advises on recruiting broadly and intentionally for both editorials and reviews and personal professional discourses.
Doctrinally, consider the criteria you will encounter. And consider and characteristics, background and core strengths. Rather than seek to disclose more information or query language and avoid bias in terminology. Conduct a brief review of false nominations in the world is taking precedence perspective and whether the language could be biasing. And then the native open source nomination and self nominating candidates may not have been identified or ready to accept.
Personal details and recommendations. We welcome engagement with persistently marginalized communities. Identifying prospective candidates, receiving a reliable reviews, and visiting those who may be lacking in the interview process is more bearing cumaceen. The diverse community and standardized testing. When setting up an editorial board.
All alternative opportunities for early career researchers to build editorial experience can help to participate on editorial boards. Now, the best strategies and technologies. If you've invited editorial fellowships, this can create an opportunity for early career researchers from diverse backgrounds and provide opportunities for additional professional development, such as writing editorials, personal views or blog postings.
Recommendation for suggests he knows that they know who he is. Provide accessible learning. For example, the American Psychological Association has pioneered online learning how to read an. Without too many citizens and allow for and provide feedback to the rules and protocol for review. When go to a website. And ensure that your business partner is accessible and easily read by a streaming.
Finally, recommendation 5 provides education into the actions and narratives to increased everything in McKenzie's that provide bias awareness, whether this is a community education resource edited by settings that promote diversity methods and transparent reporting standards. Most styles of avoiding biases and enforcing rules to the younger.
Listen for noninvasive language. The fact that provides some guidelines and ideas for scoring a goal. Rivals, for example, governments and civil liberties, including due to disclose anyone, assisted them in a mentoring relationship and offers credit to those who assisted. And consider a diverse multi-step order two decision in nitrides.
Without an annual onboarding process potential buyer he aggravating factors. The concluding section summarizes the suggestions as long as the remains of the other woman. At this point, I am free to ask the girl to appeal to the information and focus on the recommendations that you do for other pieces of information already feels like to be fully integrated with the person who will take the reins and summarize the recommendations in technological advances in articles of translation services that are small things to do with feedback.
Congratulations on that. Works best for ethical business task force. Submit all feasible fabrics for apparel skills in seeking ethical ways. And finally, all authors should be beneficiaries of reputable peer review processes. The school as representative of an inclusive community. I think that actions like those describe and ultimately affect the way medical resources.
Boni border investigated and ultimately medical training exposures. Branfoot's completeness of instruction by feedback during appraisal process. Efforts to educate editors, authors and review reviewers results in giving feedback to authors, and that is used not only in publications but in designing their research, including cancer cells, to make it more equitable and inclusive ultimately for medical publications.
These efforts can make science stronger and improve patient care. Not only will the data in the paper make an impact, but the way the authors respond in making their voices Mason Allen suture and inclusive will have an impact on the study. After hundreds of authors looking for something that is. So share the results with others in your organization and network.
You may find it useful and I have written an announcement to make about this is that translations of this booklet in Spanish and Portuguese will be coming soon. And very excited about them. So now I'm going to talk about the universal phone system.
Thank you so much and all. I can't even think that. There's a lot I right. I'm going to be sneaky about this. I can always tell when. Yeah, there are seats up front if you all want to offer this one and those who are next, you. Would you mind sitting over. That would be really great.
I am. Operations manager at the University of California. As you may or may not the University of California is actually 10 campuses. Part of Berkeley, Los Angeles, Irvine, et cetera. So I'm the Office of Business. Let's start by saying that of course, we've been learning about and addressing systemic inequalities, qualities in academic publishing, understanding obstacles.
These are as follows mattress sutures people, marginalized groups. So the library publishing coalition, Yes, there is a library publishing coalition for 10 years now. And in 2018, at the forum, the library publishing community discussed how they could respond to the political climate on the slide from the first iteration of an ethical framework that is intended to educate, provide resources and recommendations, make for a more inclusive and heterogeneous communications landscape.
And I'll read for those of you in the back, we can see this. It says publishing is a central aspect of the academic sphere. The quality and impact of a faculty member's research program is judged primarily by the quantity of publications and perceptions of value assigned to the publication. This is still true, even though we talked this morning about value and inequities in academic publishing make it difficult for authors from marginalized identities, whether defined by ethnicity, gender, geography, language, nationality, race, or other identities, and making contributions to scholarly records.
These inequities create obstacles for everything from marginalized groups and continue advancing. Academic publishing lies at the intersection of academia, publishing and librarianship. These issues from each profession we determined faculty hiring, tenure, information allocations of funding, and from which editors and reviewers are selected. Promises to come in with a suitable first publication by librarians.
Publications to purchase their collections. Authors from underrepresented and marginalized communities encounter barriers to research and publications at multiple points in the scalas communications. This is not an actual school. OK OK. I'm so glad I'm not wearing heels.
Yeah well. OK, so some history. Earlier this year, the Office of Communication, which includes representatives from the California Digital Library and the 10 campus libraries, faculty, administrators, and a Uc Press member of the group charged was needed to pose the question of equity and inclusion in scholarly communications in two ways. One, engaging in broader efforts within scholarly communication domains to discover, adopt and advocate for these practices to address systemic racism in academia and academic publishing.
And two taking measures, efforts and outcomes within our US publishing and licensing programs and services. Ghat's was asked to work to identify opportunities of the aforementioned stakeholders have to build the values and expectations inside publishing and licensing activities in terms of policies, content and participants and Additionally research, national, and international initiatives to encourage practices within cell communications.
Advocating for US participation in these broader efforts as appropriate. There's not a big test. Just research everything. We identified three potential areas of activity. The first is to create a resource on the site to help citizens navigate. And that's what I'll be talking about today. And then next on our list is exploring how US publishing can start to address issues of equity within our own publishing programs.
And third, considering how these issues might inform negotiations with publishers going forward. Very interesting. And then so this is the process for the task force that I was a part of. And actually, I will say we. And three whiteladies. And when I came on board later, I was hired in two years ago. I was talking to I guess everybody in the room, regardless of your identity is that all the ladies have been agreed with him and had walked into a room where everybody has informed, everyone was informed, everybody already knew what was happening.
They had read my work, they had read my colleagues work. They already had opinions and opinions with a deep knowledge on this topic. So you can do in July 2020, determine key stakeholders and conducted the background literature. Research identified the actions of stakeholder groups as well as the best resources to provide more detail. And then we spent about 13, including offices as an inclusion on campuses between faculty, administrators, librarians and revise that SLAP lesion.
So this is 10 campuses. This is not a small task. And then when it was all done engagement, right, we wrote it through and it was finally endorsed by the Uc system wide academic center right. And the University committee on library telecommunications. And so finally published in May 23rd. The three authors.
So this is what it looks like. It actually doesn't look like much. Gravitas so this is much, but it's very text heavy based pan, right. And what we have here is the major topics are peer review and editorial boards, authors, scholarly publishers, libraries of the work.
So you know no need some more data you want me to do that means. So Each of these little words are split up into this review of peer review and editorial boards. What is the problem. What are the inequities. And then what can I do. So this narrative about context, this narrative about actions.
And then that bullet reversible. There is like a sort of a list of what as well as competing some researchers that was as you can see, both parties presentation of this, which is amazing. And the is going to have some overlap. The difference is that we have so much faculty input as well as administrators across the system as well as the design flaws that.
I would say I would say five. And as the general manager myself, one of the things that we're doing now, which I think is really big and I don't think anyone's doing so now, is we are going to require all of our journal editors to attend a webinar. So this is an overview webinar.
Yes so we've piloted it. And we've had a couple webinars and they've been volunteering so far as anticipating priorities, but we've been telling people we're giving credit. This will be required in the future and this webinar that we're doing comes back to the different resources within this booklet, right, as well as to different kinds of webinars that are not going to be required, but will also connect us to the toolkit and different updates.
I will say the work that I'm going to be attending is in particular is changing sort of style guides and language has been a really huge opportunity for me personally to say, hey, these things that we thought were never going to change are changing because now and this is how we're going to implement them. And that has been this pathways to diversity, equity, inclusion. And actually we just hired someone brand new who's an expert accessibility.
So that's going to be incorporated soon. So incorporating all that within our and. OK And the last thing the last thing is acquiring antiquarian journals that align with your values. For example, one of the journals that we took over from the commercial side, the library publisher, it was a commercial publisher that didn't have funding actually to publish anymore and took them over to our open American Indian culture journal and my favorite for the last year.
And then just also Middle Eastern librarians Association Journal platform as well. So they had been managing their own platform and kind of revenue and experience. So one of the things that we can do is. Other states out there that are really actively working against these values. We're very fortunate to be in California and amazing system where equity and diversity is very much promoted.
It's the conflict. I'm not going to get into that. But Yeah, so we can actually point that to the US values in order to acquire general values for. Why does it No questions. Sorry our folks in the back there, if anybody wants.
OK Hi, everyone. For joining us. This opportunity to introduce myself. I'm senior editor at Sage Publishing Among other roles, essays I sit on the office. I'm really just thinking about the people or a federally authorized policy.
Very happy to say that this is what I'm talking about. I'm very much looking forward to. Motivated by thinking of as. Also this outlines 87 feddans according. Honestly has always been to enable people to fall back on institutions, policies, and practices that Because of all that we say we have the academic.
Was increasing the visibility of. For a simple policy. Hopefully, we'll be able to tell you a little bit more about our upcoming newsletters. In 20 points, 8.4 working days for emergency. My goodness.
The content frameworks ensure that our content is first read combined is a classic example of a local context space. We're working closely with hopes that our policies. The revealing by. The representation frameworks included.
I was listening to the voices of editors, editorial authors, and. We have created resources to support these status in increasing awareness combined with interviews supporting researchers. Wedding embedding inclusive language does not. Supporting Harpers Ferry. The application for supporting discrimination refers to wider audiences of researchers, practitioners, policymakers and the public.
Because is an underrepresented voices. It also introduced people to come forward with new business. You that with the glasses. That is, the dataframe focuses on the current data set to identify inequalities in the advisors and editors. Editorial it also established a foundation of revenue resulting.
The video. Friends have worked in tandem to develop a number of projects and policies. Afraid of the plain language style, which provides a pocket to express feelings and information on. It also partnered with editors and offers services and offers assistance providers, formatting references and other safety concerns in our logistics support.
Its refurbishment ketamine. We're also finding that people who can help people with three of these options for others separators. Moreover, we also moved from using the franquin's purely peer review to anonymized. For more information, call.
See also. Unconscious bias. This opportunity opportunities. All the ladies of the theater successively salaries of virtually every ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age and. He can sell. Whiteclay rolled out a voluntary demographic for tuition.
Alas, are not what's going to bring up. To disseminate some examples of sexual racism, violence and gender equity, aggressive attitudes of colonialism. And once more straining over the past two years.
It also launched a couple streaming service. The first research projects. Visiting voters. The baby's head represents an overall score of 48,000. 12,000 what do you think will be rolled out there with your website. Reviewers often say unconscious bias. 1,000 representatives the 3,500 reviewers on.
This established a set of guidelines for editorial teams. We encourage editors to evaluate the current state of affairs. We encourage them to accept the editorial board. We offer a new position. Advocating for the broad range of voices looking for representation. I think.
The author recommends topic journaling and developing strategies. The death is a good time to feel good. Reviewing submission guidelines security support for via party higher education. Also support other editors in their efforts to.
For always support junior academic advising, all providing all editorial decisions. Opposing forces. Also properly editors do your own research. Splinters editorial board. If I have the opportunity to do a.
Always, the peer review of assistance is addressed within OpenAir calls and contributors. Over the fighting. Over very, very few resources to offer to viewers. And you said that we've been inviting emigracion.
Then again, we also encourage our editors to be objective. It's already. Finally, a guideline for other movies with similar themes. Just to reiterate, using physics and biology and computers and be sure to look at their own inclusive language and consider commission guidelines and.
But it should also be willing and able to adjust mindful of offering. Well, hopefully they're open to all the stuff you want. I was encouraged to ask. We also turned our editors to understanding the authors writing. A ton of research other than the cell phone.
Other services that have. Looking to expand outwards for commercial property. Classical and literary very important. Continue to be aware of potential buyers. Thank you so much. This is my email address for things are going to move to questions for all of us, but I'm just going to slide up so you can.
So it's amazing. Thank the.
It is. But Thank eddingtons. So we get to do some questions. Such enterprises. Stergiadis notifications impatient, especially for Charlotte.
So you can mentioned editors screaming at it. We also have editor required editor training for all of our journal editors, which is largely successful but sometimes challenging. And I'm wondering if you could speak a little bit to what type of training that you're doing and how the editors have received it. So awesome spell.
Good luck. Excellent faculty. There are a lot of people are experiencing difficulty that are available. So working with. You're not in a good place.
That was literally the biggest otherwise a wonderful day that everyone had for one editor of. So the attitude. We need. Something just to get to realize this.
And then that ties into. That and. We're going. And what. Are you so happy about this. There's also there's a lot of people that are working in small teams.
Or can you think of one or two people. Need Hi. Thank you for that overview. It's now moving from publishing. I'm wondering if anyone here, not just the speakers, have done baseline assessments and the overview can you provide themselves.
But I'm wondering if you've done baseline assessments of where any of the journals are to then measure against to see if they're actually moving the needle. I mean, I think the challenge with this stuff is it is a huge list. And so at least having some numbers to look at to measure against, to see if you're making it past the talking points to actual outcomes if anyone's doing.
Across the street from the station. We're starting to get there. Actually, haven't. We've just released our. So definitely new haven't. So we're not there yet. Hopeful making that.
The is. I'm Sarah. I'm Severe. And we. So where nature has just released baseline data. I think he was angry because I remember.
Also due to their. This is. After that, they're usually also tied up for several years. We actually have granular sort of different locations.
Our editors are working on getting this. Thank Yeah. Are submitting gibson-graham. Yes well, businesses are reporting, or so the authors are offering.
If you ask a specific and nobody will tell us anything. I don't know. They are. Two three. And in-editor.
I think my question in this thing is how are we trying to solve this zoning problem. Bakelants there are mistakes that are. Pretty Galerie driving bruising. This implant is not a base line.
Yeah, I just wanted to mention. So atheist publications does an annual diversity data report. I believe we have already published three of those. And Yes, that includes data on attitudes and experiences because I think it's about the collection. But Yes, simple and progress year to year is important.
I just wanted to. Because we're finding the alignment on all of that, really. So we are not using one of the most important things. So we are trying to work with this very small system to get those questions implemented. But in the meantime, we're also rolling the. To Dublin on the data before we make the change.
So we are actually really struggling with editorial boards who are very disappointed. We don't have an answer to it. One of the consequences is also that. Probably they helpless.
It's not perfect. It's not Yes And. And like your baseline data is very important to have. But I think something to be aware of is that you don't have to have a lot of us are in the process of implementing demographic data, which is difficult and takes a lot of thought and care. So sometimes just having working with the data you have, even just having regional data is very attractive.
So you don't have to have everything at once. Start from somewhere. And we have demographic data for some of our cities and all, but we do have for all of them is the geographic data. So even just focusing on one aspect of it, that's a great place to. But I'll see to that as well, sir. Also my third year of University report.
So there's some data out there. Is that the low hanging fruit. And so institutionally, we have an institution for every paper that's published, and we know that certain institutions can be good. So I think that's the first. I came in the studio and my question is what tips you have or what recommendations do you have for dealing with editors who do not see the value of diversity.
Who say that, though. I guess homicide's not the geography or the ethnicity where it comes from. I had some difficult right. So I've had difficult conversations with this team. And I'm just curious if you have any thoughts on how to approach that. People are alive. Think they're a liability.
You're going to. You have an editor with. Reasons and now that we're losing so much adversity in the research, then especially like I think a lot of documentaries research got.
Not very much. That could be getting worse in research, science, society. That is. It's OK. What is the closest that we've taken is to try to develop policies in the editing research process.
So that we are by the orientation among editors and also at the outset seeking a more diverse search committee that can engage in. Seriously this is kind. So I think that publishers do have a role to play. Excuse my mistake.
I think it's. Could that be helpful. The number 3, guys. So hopefully. Matters will feel that we are the guys we have. Very much.
Yeah, that's true. Yeah let's do your point and I'll do speaker Sage Journals. But we do have examples for. Income with supplemental Federation and answer his question. We have run into this and called for other considerations. Do not be the best practice, but what we do in my journal is we require an annual certification by every member of our editorial board to find that they uphold.
We agree to the terms of our commitment and we will stand with them and we are quite happy to see them go if they would say that we have looked into that and. Hi, my name is Ryan ray. I'm with the American actress. So at some journals I worked at, just in response how to deal with different writers, I think one thing that doesn't really discuss as much like soft power.
So if you have, I don't every editorial board is a little bit different. But if it's not, it's the editors in chief that are having a problem with this. Maybe you can get some help from the viewers or assistant managers or maybe sometimes even the authors themselves. They can really be drivers of change. And so we've seen that where the editorial makeup is a little bit more diverse than the state and they can really be a powerful because I think sometimes editors like this publisher and they're like this is going up and down.
And when they see it here, it's somewhat more respected. And otherwise you're going to have this. And so. So Catherine says the American Physical Society. And I was just wondering if the whole or any of those materials discussed how to approach reviewers and reviewing or removing and mitigating some of the biases that might happen during the review process that others may notice and may not know how.
We have many things that. So this question was asking this question. Over so from my perspective, I would say that we do. I'm three.
If you do. Yes but I think. Doesn't feel like where the competitors. So hopefully. Key issues with yearss.
That evening. I feel like we're Because of all this. Fire one of. So we say, hey, we're doing. So mean. I like.
So one of the things I'd like to. So what do I say. How do I make sure that what I can say to them is make your peer review rubric available to. The authors can also have. We were not adults. There were.
It had better than even so many articles. Sometimes when someone you care. So I haven't thought about those answers in a while. This content. Life is terrible.
I have a recommendation for and this is real. This is a big decision. I think one of the ways that we try to burji training classifiers. With multiple personalities now. In addition to that at. So that actually using various models, in theory here, we want to assume that this is, those are approaches.
But I think that is it's a large issue because it has is but it is a way you obviously. Spellbinding I'm feeling very, very sleepy. I had a question relating to your specific candidate, and I was wondering what information would be valuable to them for getting their evaluating submissions based not just on the content, but also additional information that would be valuable to them.
And how do you balance the need for that data in some ways to be able to work around that, give them additional information. Or is this a time to evaluate admission materials based on their background. You in our. Is it a reasonable policies. And we have a checklist for them to follow.
And they are learning these things that really apply. And we'll know that because those reserves, they have a research and they also have reflected and incidence of that indication that they know they're looking for specific things in the research in addition to their own background experience. And we see those.
Those same tecomates Mr. Ferguson is one of the few present members who refuses to go back to the jungle next time because what he would do and why he was doing that. That was the only thing I would say.
Of right. I don't know where he's hiding. Well, Thank you very much for your discussion, discussions and possibly plaser.
Segment:0 .
By imposing express's commission for this amazing innovation and inspiring. The monument was stolen. Although most journal editors and publishers recognized the value of being among the associate editors and editorial boards, it can be overwhelming to actually concentrate the editorial board or to a long established one.
And so those who have not been included. And if you need advice regarding the actions they can take to diversify their boards. This panel is really looking at the perspectives of all organizations that have recently developed interests or guidelines to ensure equity, inclusion and results and practical suggestions. So I'm Sally. I'm going to be covering the single distinguished authors winners of the SSP automated building and editorial roles and behavioral and focused on urban education policies.
And then Charlotte Rowe will talk about the scholarly communication website developed by the University of California, and Karen Schreier will talk about the same website, embracing the role of the reviewer and diverse, equitable, and basic user. So I just got quite an introduction. Audience and accreditations at the American Academy of neurology, where I oversee publication of applied neurology journals along with the Journal News tabloid and mainstream.
Pilot is a hesitations manager for University of California and collaborates with librarians and insertions of practice on campus using systems to manage the journal publishing program. Intern is a senior editor for The Sage Publishing on humanities and social sciences department. Managing and acquiring titles and economics of social science journals and unfolded the motifs.
So our cooking show, the slide is called ascendant when redsun today. And one more slide to remind everyone about core values. Until the drawing session by talking about the latest news with Newsweek August equity series that was released on Tuesday, May 7, on the Coalition for diversity in scholarly communications for infodisc website.
So this a purpose to pursue education services and editorial roles. And now he is always looking to build relationships. Editorial in rural communities as a student, be proud that this booklet included in the outreach subcommittee of the Ethics Committee. So Thanks again to the subcommittee members for all the volunteers with the time to utilize this valuable resource, and especially to Susan Harris and Sheila Lyons, who led the creation of the system.
And Susan is here. So it's amazing to me that stand up. Slavics welcome in this. The end result was just a fraction of an instant approval. Start of my journey in neurology on a path that subsequently led to personal workflow and translated.
It was a crowning ceremony in February 2003. There was a snowstorm later in the day and I was able to get a lot done because the building closed early. I had chosen a few main tasks. I had to get done that day and was scheduled for a number of meetings with staff. Before I go, self-examination, horribles that are confused about something that you studied and asked me to go to the website and read it.
Those are things imagining different experiences, questions that I had never seen. A section of emails, phones and other personal reflections of Americans that relate to their experiences in crisis. There's a chance looking for Sabhapati's incredible capacity across as we are seeing here. All the personal skills that are self-assertion present in the breath. Professores one.
All the memorized verses in verses. It is obvious that he was head of the Jews containing the racial stereotypes that are not aligned with our society, schools or anything else. There is a numerous one of hundreds of emails and many social media channels protesting this position. This fees, lack of discussion about communications with the society and decided the only way to restore accountability for the violence intended by resupplying a file with contrasting notices with no other information.
The article had no vestige of the article left behind. This is another example. Subsequently overwhelming to the membership of local societies in the South. Reprograms themselves for evil to and medical processes and forces so that nothing like this could ever happen again. And we announced that we would take steps to. In addition, this was the editorial that we wrote as rhinocerotis outlined how the responsibility for the possession of a brain by adding several diverse editors and crew over the language site, is the focus of the ad and provide a sensitivity to make style changes to ensure a successful violent language and increase the diversity of the editorial board and the team of special editors who will boost diversity in closed doors.
I'm hoping that this experience will never happen to any of you. At the time, five years ago, there were no general guidelines available implementing these changes. Just learning how to be done. A lot has happened in the past five years. Managing editors and publishers have become very overt, and the agency virgins were our boys, and they're looking for guidance. They had information and recommendations.
Raffinate editorial board members. We would have loved to have had the advice in the Navy SEAL dispirited after this incident or those first destroyed that we could have avoided it. The pamphlet recommends and subsequent relevant lessons for overseas inhabitants to take to create broad representation on editorial boards and to ensure fairness and utilization of bias in the hearing process.
I'm just going to give you a very brief preview today thing. There are five major recommendations reflected in this infographic that are explored in the system. Actions to develop uses. To initiate scraps or selecting or importing demographic data to guide goal setting and actions for increased diversity. The coolgardie.
Intentionally platon's participation of the marginalized communities and opportunities for students in rural schools and informal scholarship areas, and actions based on sources such as bias free language guidelines. More equitable will be methods to increase equity in the peer review process. Of course, initially we hired an artist because the attractive artwork for the scorpion and the frog, those are only possible with slicing the hell out of the roller coaster itself.
So I'm getting working this as well as the. OK Thank you. Recommendation one outlines actions to help develop an inclusive culture in motion. One of the first steps is an informal commitment called a Diversity Statement, and concluding Pettersson, along with an editorial committed to addressing more pervasive racism. This reckoning in the editorial board said writers representation is an orphan during the editorial process, and the first one, a dedicated associate magazine's editorial board members who use these notice for compliance language policies like data sharing and an access to resources to distribute and set rules and standards versus brain and azoteas.
Recommendation tools and steps for collecting and reporting demographic data. And those involved in the other purposes. The guide goal setting and subsequent matches to increase diversity. We'll want to gather baseline demographic data. One of the first challenges is deciding which trends, values and methods present in data tracking system. So the government had in mind that demographic data needs to be gathered in a way that respects privacy.
So having all gather, inclusive, transparent process of anonymized data and all is good as a bricklayer, so burfi is absolutely essential. So limit access necessary for public education is a terrible mental space to try out the reasons. Recommendation three advises on recruiting broadly and intentionally for both editorials and reviews and personal professional discourses.
Doctrinally, consider the criteria you will encounter. And consider and characteristics, background and core strengths. Rather than seek to disclose more information or query language and avoid bias in terminology. Conduct a brief review of false nominations in the world is taking precedence perspective and whether the language could be biasing. And then the native open source nomination and self nominating candidates may not have been identified or ready to accept.
Personal details and recommendations. We welcome engagement with persistently marginalized communities. Identifying prospective candidates, receiving a reliable reviews, and visiting those who may be lacking in the interview process is more bearing cumaceen. The diverse community and standardized testing. When setting up an editorial board.
All alternative opportunities for early career researchers to build editorial experience can help to participate on editorial boards. Now, the best strategies and technologies. If you've invited editorial fellowships, this can create an opportunity for early career researchers from diverse backgrounds and provide opportunities for additional professional development, such as writing editorials, personal views or blog postings.
Recommendation for suggests he knows that they know who he is. Provide accessible learning. For example, the American Psychological Association has pioneered online learning how to read an. Without too many citizens and allow for and provide feedback to the rules and protocol for review. When go to a website. And ensure that your business partner is accessible and easily read by a streaming.
Finally, recommendation 5 provides education into the actions and narratives to increased everything in McKenzie's that provide bias awareness, whether this is a community education resource edited by settings that promote diversity methods and transparent reporting standards. Most styles of avoiding biases and enforcing rules to the younger.
Listen for noninvasive language. The fact that provides some guidelines and ideas for scoring a goal. Rivals, for example, governments and civil liberties, including due to disclose anyone, assisted them in a mentoring relationship and offers credit to those who assisted. And consider a diverse multi-step order two decision in nitrides.
Without an annual onboarding process potential buyer he aggravating factors. The concluding section summarizes the suggestions as long as the remains of the other woman. At this point, I am free to ask the girl to appeal to the information and focus on the recommendations that you do for other pieces of information already feels like to be fully integrated with the person who will take the reins and summarize the recommendations in technological advances in articles of translation services that are small things to do with feedback.
Congratulations on that. Works best for ethical business task force. Submit all feasible fabrics for apparel skills in seeking ethical ways. And finally, all authors should be beneficiaries of reputable peer review processes. The school as representative of an inclusive community. I think that actions like those describe and ultimately affect the way medical resources.
Boni border investigated and ultimately medical training exposures. Branfoot's completeness of instruction by feedback during appraisal process. Efforts to educate editors, authors and review reviewers results in giving feedback to authors, and that is used not only in publications but in designing their research, including cancer cells, to make it more equitable and inclusive ultimately for medical publications.
These efforts can make science stronger and improve patient care. Not only will the data in the paper make an impact, but the way the authors respond in making their voices Mason Allen suture and inclusive will have an impact on the study. After hundreds of authors looking for something that is. So share the results with others in your organization and network.
You may find it useful and I have written an announcement to make about this is that translations of this booklet in Spanish and Portuguese will be coming soon. And very excited about them. So now I'm going to talk about the universal phone system.
Thank you so much and all. I can't even think that. There's a lot I right. I'm going to be sneaky about this. I can always tell when. Yeah, there are seats up front if you all want to offer this one and those who are next, you. Would you mind sitting over. That would be really great.
I am. Operations manager at the University of California. As you may or may not the University of California is actually 10 campuses. Part of Berkeley, Los Angeles, Irvine, et cetera. So I'm the Office of Business. Let's start by saying that of course, we've been learning about and addressing systemic inequalities, qualities in academic publishing, understanding obstacles.
These are as follows mattress sutures people, marginalized groups. So the library publishing coalition, Yes, there is a library publishing coalition for 10 years now. And in 2018, at the forum, the library publishing community discussed how they could respond to the political climate on the slide from the first iteration of an ethical framework that is intended to educate, provide resources and recommendations, make for a more inclusive and heterogeneous communications landscape.
And I'll read for those of you in the back, we can see this. It says publishing is a central aspect of the academic sphere. The quality and impact of a faculty member's research program is judged primarily by the quantity of publications and perceptions of value assigned to the publication. This is still true, even though we talked this morning about value and inequities in academic publishing make it difficult for authors from marginalized identities, whether defined by ethnicity, gender, geography, language, nationality, race, or other identities, and making contributions to scholarly records.
These inequities create obstacles for everything from marginalized groups and continue advancing. Academic publishing lies at the intersection of academia, publishing and librarianship. These issues from each profession we determined faculty hiring, tenure, information allocations of funding, and from which editors and reviewers are selected. Promises to come in with a suitable first publication by librarians.
Publications to purchase their collections. Authors from underrepresented and marginalized communities encounter barriers to research and publications at multiple points in the scalas communications. This is not an actual school. OK OK. I'm so glad I'm not wearing heels.
Yeah well. OK, so some history. Earlier this year, the Office of Communication, which includes representatives from the California Digital Library and the 10 campus libraries, faculty, administrators, and a Uc Press member of the group charged was needed to pose the question of equity and inclusion in scholarly communications in two ways. One, engaging in broader efforts within scholarly communication domains to discover, adopt and advocate for these practices to address systemic racism in academia and academic publishing.
And two taking measures, efforts and outcomes within our US publishing and licensing programs and services. Ghat's was asked to work to identify opportunities of the aforementioned stakeholders have to build the values and expectations inside publishing and licensing activities in terms of policies, content and participants and Additionally research, national, and international initiatives to encourage practices within cell communications.
Advocating for US participation in these broader efforts as appropriate. There's not a big test. Just research everything. We identified three potential areas of activity. The first is to create a resource on the site to help citizens navigate. And that's what I'll be talking about today. And then next on our list is exploring how US publishing can start to address issues of equity within our own publishing programs.
And third, considering how these issues might inform negotiations with publishers going forward. Very interesting. And then so this is the process for the task force that I was a part of. And actually, I will say we. And three whiteladies. And when I came on board later, I was hired in two years ago. I was talking to I guess everybody in the room, regardless of your identity is that all the ladies have been agreed with him and had walked into a room where everybody has informed, everyone was informed, everybody already knew what was happening.
They had read my work, they had read my colleagues work. They already had opinions and opinions with a deep knowledge on this topic. So you can do in July 2020, determine key stakeholders and conducted the background literature. Research identified the actions of stakeholder groups as well as the best resources to provide more detail. And then we spent about 13, including offices as an inclusion on campuses between faculty, administrators, librarians and revise that SLAP lesion.
So this is 10 campuses. This is not a small task. And then when it was all done engagement, right, we wrote it through and it was finally endorsed by the Uc system wide academic center right. And the University committee on library telecommunications. And so finally published in May 23rd. The three authors.
So this is what it looks like. It actually doesn't look like much. Gravitas so this is much, but it's very text heavy based pan, right. And what we have here is the major topics are peer review and editorial boards, authors, scholarly publishers, libraries of the work.
So you know no need some more data you want me to do that means. So Each of these little words are split up into this review of peer review and editorial boards. What is the problem. What are the inequities. And then what can I do. So this narrative about context, this narrative about actions.
And then that bullet reversible. There is like a sort of a list of what as well as competing some researchers that was as you can see, both parties presentation of this, which is amazing. And the is going to have some overlap. The difference is that we have so much faculty input as well as administrators across the system as well as the design flaws that.
I would say I would say five. And as the general manager myself, one of the things that we're doing now, which I think is really big and I don't think anyone's doing so now, is we are going to require all of our journal editors to attend a webinar. So this is an overview webinar.
Yes so we've piloted it. And we've had a couple webinars and they've been volunteering so far as anticipating priorities, but we've been telling people we're giving credit. This will be required in the future and this webinar that we're doing comes back to the different resources within this booklet, right, as well as to different kinds of webinars that are not going to be required, but will also connect us to the toolkit and different updates.
I will say the work that I'm going to be attending is in particular is changing sort of style guides and language has been a really huge opportunity for me personally to say, hey, these things that we thought were never going to change are changing because now and this is how we're going to implement them. And that has been this pathways to diversity, equity, inclusion. And actually we just hired someone brand new who's an expert accessibility.
So that's going to be incorporated soon. So incorporating all that within our and. OK And the last thing the last thing is acquiring antiquarian journals that align with your values. For example, one of the journals that we took over from the commercial side, the library publisher, it was a commercial publisher that didn't have funding actually to publish anymore and took them over to our open American Indian culture journal and my favorite for the last year.
And then just also Middle Eastern librarians Association Journal platform as well. So they had been managing their own platform and kind of revenue and experience. So one of the things that we can do is. Other states out there that are really actively working against these values. We're very fortunate to be in California and amazing system where equity and diversity is very much promoted.
It's the conflict. I'm not going to get into that. But Yeah, so we can actually point that to the US values in order to acquire general values for. Why does it No questions. Sorry our folks in the back there, if anybody wants.
OK Hi, everyone. For joining us. This opportunity to introduce myself. I'm senior editor at Sage Publishing Among other roles, essays I sit on the office. I'm really just thinking about the people or a federally authorized policy.
Very happy to say that this is what I'm talking about. I'm very much looking forward to. Motivated by thinking of as. Also this outlines 87 feddans according. Honestly has always been to enable people to fall back on institutions, policies, and practices that Because of all that we say we have the academic.
Was increasing the visibility of. For a simple policy. Hopefully, we'll be able to tell you a little bit more about our upcoming newsletters. In 20 points, 8.4 working days for emergency. My goodness.
The content frameworks ensure that our content is first read combined is a classic example of a local context space. We're working closely with hopes that our policies. The revealing by. The representation frameworks included.
I was listening to the voices of editors, editorial authors, and. We have created resources to support these status in increasing awareness combined with interviews supporting researchers. Wedding embedding inclusive language does not. Supporting Harpers Ferry. The application for supporting discrimination refers to wider audiences of researchers, practitioners, policymakers and the public.
Because is an underrepresented voices. It also introduced people to come forward with new business. You that with the glasses. That is, the dataframe focuses on the current data set to identify inequalities in the advisors and editors. Editorial it also established a foundation of revenue resulting.
The video. Friends have worked in tandem to develop a number of projects and policies. Afraid of the plain language style, which provides a pocket to express feelings and information on. It also partnered with editors and offers services and offers assistance providers, formatting references and other safety concerns in our logistics support.
Its refurbishment ketamine. We're also finding that people who can help people with three of these options for others separators. Moreover, we also moved from using the franquin's purely peer review to anonymized. For more information, call.
See also. Unconscious bias. This opportunity opportunities. All the ladies of the theater successively salaries of virtually every ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age and. He can sell. Whiteclay rolled out a voluntary demographic for tuition.
Alas, are not what's going to bring up. To disseminate some examples of sexual racism, violence and gender equity, aggressive attitudes of colonialism. And once more straining over the past two years.
It also launched a couple streaming service. The first research projects. Visiting voters. The baby's head represents an overall score of 48,000. 12,000 what do you think will be rolled out there with your website. Reviewers often say unconscious bias. 1,000 representatives the 3,500 reviewers on.
This established a set of guidelines for editorial teams. We encourage editors to evaluate the current state of affairs. We encourage them to accept the editorial board. We offer a new position. Advocating for the broad range of voices looking for representation. I think.
The author recommends topic journaling and developing strategies. The death is a good time to feel good. Reviewing submission guidelines security support for via party higher education. Also support other editors in their efforts to.
For always support junior academic advising, all providing all editorial decisions. Opposing forces. Also properly editors do your own research. Splinters editorial board. If I have the opportunity to do a.
Always, the peer review of assistance is addressed within OpenAir calls and contributors. Over the fighting. Over very, very few resources to offer to viewers. And you said that we've been inviting emigracion.
Then again, we also encourage our editors to be objective. It's already. Finally, a guideline for other movies with similar themes. Just to reiterate, using physics and biology and computers and be sure to look at their own inclusive language and consider commission guidelines and.
But it should also be willing and able to adjust mindful of offering. Well, hopefully they're open to all the stuff you want. I was encouraged to ask. We also turned our editors to understanding the authors writing. A ton of research other than the cell phone.
Other services that have. Looking to expand outwards for commercial property. Classical and literary very important. Continue to be aware of potential buyers. Thank you so much. This is my email address for things are going to move to questions for all of us, but I'm just going to slide up so you can.
So it's amazing. Thank the.
It is. But Thank eddingtons. So we get to do some questions. Such enterprises. Stergiadis notifications impatient, especially for Charlotte.
So you can mentioned editors screaming at it. We also have editor required editor training for all of our journal editors, which is largely successful but sometimes challenging. And I'm wondering if you could speak a little bit to what type of training that you're doing and how the editors have received it. So awesome spell.
Good luck. Excellent faculty. There are a lot of people are experiencing difficulty that are available. So working with. You're not in a good place.
That was literally the biggest otherwise a wonderful day that everyone had for one editor of. So the attitude. We need. Something just to get to realize this.
And then that ties into. That and. We're going. And what. Are you so happy about this. There's also there's a lot of people that are working in small teams.
Or can you think of one or two people. Need Hi. Thank you for that overview. It's now moving from publishing. I'm wondering if anyone here, not just the speakers, have done baseline assessments and the overview can you provide themselves.
But I'm wondering if you've done baseline assessments of where any of the journals are to then measure against to see if they're actually moving the needle. I mean, I think the challenge with this stuff is it is a huge list. And so at least having some numbers to look at to measure against, to see if you're making it past the talking points to actual outcomes if anyone's doing.
Across the street from the station. We're starting to get there. Actually, haven't. We've just released our. So definitely new haven't. So we're not there yet. Hopeful making that.
The is. I'm Sarah. I'm Severe. And we. So where nature has just released baseline data. I think he was angry because I remember.
Also due to their. This is. After that, they're usually also tied up for several years. We actually have granular sort of different locations.
Our editors are working on getting this. Thank Yeah. Are submitting gibson-graham. Yes well, businesses are reporting, or so the authors are offering.
If you ask a specific and nobody will tell us anything. I don't know. They are. Two three. And in-editor.
I think my question in this thing is how are we trying to solve this zoning problem. Bakelants there are mistakes that are. Pretty Galerie driving bruising. This implant is not a base line.
Yeah, I just wanted to mention. So atheist publications does an annual diversity data report. I believe we have already published three of those. And Yes, that includes data on attitudes and experiences because I think it's about the collection. But Yes, simple and progress year to year is important.
I just wanted to. Because we're finding the alignment on all of that, really. So we are not using one of the most important things. So we are trying to work with this very small system to get those questions implemented. But in the meantime, we're also rolling the. To Dublin on the data before we make the change.
So we are actually really struggling with editorial boards who are very disappointed. We don't have an answer to it. One of the consequences is also that. Probably they helpless.
It's not perfect. It's not Yes And. And like your baseline data is very important to have. But I think something to be aware of is that you don't have to have a lot of us are in the process of implementing demographic data, which is difficult and takes a lot of thought and care. So sometimes just having working with the data you have, even just having regional data is very attractive.
So you don't have to have everything at once. Start from somewhere. And we have demographic data for some of our cities and all, but we do have for all of them is the geographic data. So even just focusing on one aspect of it, that's a great place to. But I'll see to that as well, sir. Also my third year of University report.
So there's some data out there. Is that the low hanging fruit. And so institutionally, we have an institution for every paper that's published, and we know that certain institutions can be good. So I think that's the first. I came in the studio and my question is what tips you have or what recommendations do you have for dealing with editors who do not see the value of diversity.
Who say that, though. I guess homicide's not the geography or the ethnicity where it comes from. I had some difficult right. So I've had difficult conversations with this team. And I'm just curious if you have any thoughts on how to approach that. People are alive. Think they're a liability.
You're going to. You have an editor with. Reasons and now that we're losing so much adversity in the research, then especially like I think a lot of documentaries research got.
Not very much. That could be getting worse in research, science, society. That is. It's OK. What is the closest that we've taken is to try to develop policies in the editing research process.
So that we are by the orientation among editors and also at the outset seeking a more diverse search committee that can engage in. Seriously this is kind. So I think that publishers do have a role to play. Excuse my mistake.
I think it's. Could that be helpful. The number 3, guys. So hopefully. Matters will feel that we are the guys we have. Very much.
Yeah, that's true. Yeah let's do your point and I'll do speaker Sage Journals. But we do have examples for. Income with supplemental Federation and answer his question. We have run into this and called for other considerations. Do not be the best practice, but what we do in my journal is we require an annual certification by every member of our editorial board to find that they uphold.
We agree to the terms of our commitment and we will stand with them and we are quite happy to see them go if they would say that we have looked into that and. Hi, my name is Ryan ray. I'm with the American actress. So at some journals I worked at, just in response how to deal with different writers, I think one thing that doesn't really discuss as much like soft power.
So if you have, I don't every editorial board is a little bit different. But if it's not, it's the editors in chief that are having a problem with this. Maybe you can get some help from the viewers or assistant managers or maybe sometimes even the authors themselves. They can really be drivers of change. And so we've seen that where the editorial makeup is a little bit more diverse than the state and they can really be a powerful because I think sometimes editors like this publisher and they're like this is going up and down.
And when they see it here, it's somewhat more respected. And otherwise you're going to have this. And so. So Catherine says the American Physical Society. And I was just wondering if the whole or any of those materials discussed how to approach reviewers and reviewing or removing and mitigating some of the biases that might happen during the review process that others may notice and may not know how.
We have many things that. So this question was asking this question. Over so from my perspective, I would say that we do. I'm three.
If you do. Yes but I think. Doesn't feel like where the competitors. So hopefully. Key issues with yearss.
That evening. I feel like we're Because of all this. Fire one of. So we say, hey, we're doing. So mean. I like.
So one of the things I'd like to. So what do I say. How do I make sure that what I can say to them is make your peer review rubric available to. The authors can also have. We were not adults. There were.
It had better than even so many articles. Sometimes when someone you care. So I haven't thought about those answers in a while. This content. Life is terrible.
I have a recommendation for and this is real. This is a big decision. I think one of the ways that we try to burji training classifiers. With multiple personalities now. In addition to that at. So that actually using various models, in theory here, we want to assume that this is, those are approaches.
But I think that is it's a large issue because it has is but it is a way you obviously. Spellbinding I'm feeling very, very sleepy. I had a question relating to your specific candidate, and I was wondering what information would be valuable to them for getting their evaluating submissions based not just on the content, but also additional information that would be valuable to them.
And how do you balance the need for that data in some ways to be able to work around that, give them additional information. Or is this a time to evaluate admission materials based on their background. You in our. Is it a reasonable policies. And we have a checklist for them to follow.
And they are learning these things that really apply. And we'll know that because those reserves, they have a research and they also have reflected and incidence of that indication that they know they're looking for specific things in the research in addition to their own background experience. And we see those.
Those same tecomates Mr. Ferguson is one of the few present members who refuses to go back to the jungle next time because what he would do and why he was doing that. That was the only thing I would say.
Of right. I don't know where he's hiding. Well, Thank you very much for your discussion, discussions and possibly plaser.
Form Title Download
Transcript
Form Title Bookmark
Entire Media
Segment(s)
Custom Clip
Start At:
End At:
Form Title Share
Entire Media
Segment(s)
Custom Clip
Start At:
End At:
Form Title Accessibility and Keyboard Shortcuts
The cadmore media player is a professional video and audio player experience designed to deliver media as well as relevant transcript, segmentation, and metadata. On the screen is a traditional html video player with buttons such as play, pause, forward, captioning, language and play speed selection and more. Adjacent to the video player are generally tabs, one of which shows a scrolling transcript of the video and the other shows any segmentation of the media, sometimes referred to as chapters. At the top of the video is a menu bar containing an Explore button and Tools button. The Explore button allows you to dig deeper into the video by opening up an explore dialog which contains tabs for a visual navigation of the video using thumbnails, an about tab which contains rich metadata about the media, a segments tab which contains further information about the video, and a related tab which contains links to other media related to this media. The tools button opens a menu with options for sharing the media on social media, creating bookmarking links, creating embed codes for your website, generating citations, and more.
Keyboard Shortcuts
Keyboard shortcuts only work while you are in forms mode. By entering forms mode, you will be able to quickly access portions of the media player with single key commands.
Spacebar: Play/Pause Toggle
I: Info Menu,
O: Tools Menu
T: Transcript Tab,
S: Segments Tab
F: Forward 15,
R: Rewind 15
L: Languages,
P: Playspeed
M: Mute Toggle,
V: Volume Bar
N: Video Only Toggle,
B: Full Screen Toggle
C: Captions Toggle
Escape: Closes dialogs and menus / Exits Player
Z: Next Transcript Chapter
X: Previous Transcript Chapter
Q: Next Transcript Paragraph
W: Previous Transcript Paragraph
Entire Media
Segment(s)
Custom Clip
Start At:
End At:
Embed Size
-
You Size - Responsive
-
We Size - Responsive
-
Picture Overlay Popup
-
400 x 225
-
512 x 288
-
400 x 700
-
768 x 1024
-
1024 x 512
-
1280 x 608
Form Title Cite
No citation provided.
Info
Segments
Related
Thumbnails
Exit Clip Mode
You have requested to see a portion of the video outside of the clip.
Click OK to switch to the full video or click if you would like to stay inside the clip. You can always go back to the clip with Tools and Clip Mode