Name:
                                10.3171/2022.3.FOCVID2216
                            
                            
                                Description:
                                10.3171/2022.3.FOCVID2216
                            
                            
                                Thumbnail URL:
                                https://cadmoremediastorage.blob.core.windows.net/7fdac64a-7380-4323-894d-dd7b786a2013/videoscrubberimages/Scrubber_256.jpg
                            
                            
                                Duration:
                                T00H06M38S
                            
                            
                                Embed URL:
                                https://stream.cadmore.media/player/7fdac64a-7380-4323-894d-dd7b786a2013
                            
                            
                                Content URL:
                                https://cadmoreoriginalmedia.blob.core.windows.net/7fdac64a-7380-4323-894d-dd7b786a2013/9. 22-16.mp4?sv=2019-02-02&sr=c&sig=c1KfCCMcFHO4vR3bNxhSbn%2BhC2NBVM2jqApuvfu2L%2BE%3D&st=2025-10-31T00%3A05%3A49Z&se=2025-10-31T02%3A10%3A49Z&sp=r
                            
                            
                                Upload Date:
                                2022-05-31T00:00:00.0000000
                            
                            
                                Transcript:
                                Language: EN. 
Segment:0 . 
[MUSIC PLAYING]    
SPEAKER: The lateral  lumbar interbody fusion   has evolved as newly envisioned  access corridors become   feasible via  technological advances.   Prone lateral access emerged  as a single-position approach   to combine the benefits of  minimally invasive surgery   with direct and  indirect decompression   of the neural elements  via synergistic anterior   and posterior column correction.   As our experience with  this approach has evolved,   so has our understanding  of the challenges   inherent in single- position surgery.    
SPEAKER: In this video, we discuss  the pearls, pitfalls,   and adjuvant technologies we use  in a high-volume prone lateral   center.   Choosing anatomically  ideal candidates   for prone lateral access  requires evaluation   of plane films in quality MRIs.   As with all  surgeries, safe access   is predicated on knowledge  of the structures   in and around the  operative corridor.    
SPEAKER: In this, prone  lateral surgeons are   required to adopt a general  surgeon mentality when   evaluating the  retroperitoneal space,   assessing local vasculature  and neural elements.   Bony anatomy, including  vertebral body shape,   transitional levels, and  iliac crest morphology,   are also necessary to generate  a 3D understanding of the access   corridor.   Throughout this  video, several themes   will emerge that significantly  improve prone lateral access   workflow.    
SPEAKER: 1) Efficient use  of fluoroscopy,   which significantly improves  workflow as the access corridor   is most familiar in a true  parallel-to-floor position.   2) Maintaining a healthy  respect for gravity.   Gravity's pull can both  help and harm access,   benefiting  retroperitoneal dissection   while pulling the docking  system suboptimally downward.   Careful attention to shim  placement in this position   is therefore important.    
SPEAKER: Our use of saphenous  SSEP mitigates damage   from lumbar plexus traction  in the lateral position.   Damage to anterior  structures is mitigated   with optimal positioning, time  spent understanding imaging,   and awareness of  gravitational forces.   We will discuss the  pearls and pitfalls   for the prone lateral corpectomy  through a case example.   The patient is a  68-year-old female   who sustained a ground-level  fall 4 months prior,   now presenting with  severe low-back pain   and shooting pains down  her right buttock and leg.    
SPEAKER: Physical examination revealed  no gross abnormalities   in strength or sensation,  marked tenderness   to the mid-lower back,  and a general inability   to ambulate due to pain.   MRI and x-ray from  the outside hospital   revealed a burst  fracture at lumbar 3,   causing right centric  compression of the thecal sac   and exiting nerve roots without  gross disturbance of lumbar   lordosis.    
SPEAKER: Given her overall clinical  picture and imaging findings,   she was determined to be a  candidate for a prone lateral   corpectomy with posterior  decompression and fusion   across the corpectomy level.   For the purposes  of this video, we   will focus on the first two  components of the procedure.    The patient is positioned  prone, as demonstrated   on this cadaveric model.    
SPEAKER: Note the custom bolsters  in tape simultaneously   resisting lateral forces while  allowing manual distraction   of the rib-hip angle.   Also note the strict parallel  orientation to the floor.   This is critical for the  access surgeon to internalize,   especially if slight  oblique angulation is   necessary for ergonomic ease.   The ribs and iliac  crest are marked.   The planned incision  is placed slightly   posterior to a  typical LLIF incision   in order to account for gravity.    
SPEAKER: This can either be found with  preplanned robotic navigation   or fluoroscopy.   Here we demonstrate incision  marking via the latter.   A line is made through the  midpoint of the disc space,   followed by the posterior, then  midpoint, of the vertebral body.   The incision is then marked as a  diagonal along a natural Langer   line.   Retroperitoneal access is  made with sweeping motions,   feeling for the iliac crest  inferiorly as a guide point.   A posterior-to- anterior trajectory   is safest, pushing the  abdominal contents with gravity   downward rather than lateral.   Palpation of the  transverse process   confirms medial extent  and the initial dilator   is then passed over  the docked hand.   Position at the disc  space is confirmed   on AP and lateral fluoroscopy.   This is then held with a K-wire.    
SPEAKER: Directional EMG is then  used to guide dilation.   Once satisfied,  the access system   is then placed over the final  dilator in a similar fashion   and then docked to the patient.   Spot fluoroscopy is performed  to confirm the site.   Directional EMG then again  confirms the position.   The first view into  the working corridor   is now seen, ideally an  endplate-to-endplate view   with the posterior  disc space in sight.    
SPEAKER: The retractor is  carefully opened   to maximize this corridor.   We also use saphenous SSEP  as an adjunctive gauge   for timely retractor removal.   We found that this better  approximates neural injury   over standard posterior  tibial SSEPs given   that the femoral nerve is  at a higher risk of apraxia   during this approach.   We now localize  for our corpectomy,   confirming our disc spaces  superiorly and inferiorly.    
SPEAKER: The discectomy is performed  efficiently with care   to maintain an orthogonal  trajectory and to not push   through the  contralateral annulus.   Vertebral body is  also carefully removed   under fluoroscopic guidance.   The trial is sized and the  implant is placed and expanded.   Perc screws are performed  in standard fashion   with the lateral  incision kept open   in case extra extension  of the cage is   necessary after  posterior distraction.    
SPEAKER: In this case, no  adjustments were made.   The patient was discharged  on postoperative day 6,   ambulating with a  front-wheeled walker   without new neurologic deficit.   Postoperative films  are shown here.   Careful preoperative planning,  knowledge of technology   available, and  capacity to mitigate   inherent procedural  pitfalls will   continue to allow  surgeons to maximize   the prone lateral corridor  for lumbosacral pathology.    
SPEAKER: