Cadmore media player playing video 10.3171/2025.4.FOCVID2517
Video Player
Accessibility
Using forms mode, you can utilize keyboard shortcuts to make usability more efficient.
Space bar will play and pause the video. Pressing escape will close all displays and pressing it again will jump to the end of the player.
You can press A to open the Keyboard Shortcut Dialog which also provides an audio description of the player and all of its features.
Language
1x
Play Speed
Adjust Volume
Transcript
Search
Result Count
of
Click to jump to result
Search
Re-center
Segments
Result Count
of
Click to jump to result
Search
Name:
10.3171/2025.4.FOCVID2517
Description:
10.3171/2025.4.FOCVID2517
Thumbnail URL:
https://cadmoremediastorage.blob.core.windows.net/a5d8374e-0c99-4d11-9ce9-1862a26cba13/videoscrubberimages/Scrubber_431.jpg
Duration:
T00H10M29S
Embed URL:
https://stream.cadmore.media/player/a5d8374e-0c99-4d11-9ce9-1862a26cba13
Content URL:
https://cadmoreoriginalmedia.blob.core.windows.net/a5d8374e-0c99-4d11-9ce9-1862a26cba13/7. 25-17.mp4?sv=2019-02-02&sr=c&sig=a5%2BHJHBPU7ZlHMFYUZk5FgU%2BY6JGJ6JuKCxVyNb%2FUNY%3D&st=2025-12-11T02%3A49%3A11Z&se=2025-12-11T04%3A54%3A11Z&sp=r
Upload Date:
2025-12-11T02:54:11.2709390Z
Transcript:
Language: EN.
Segment:0 .
[MUSIC PLAYING]
SPEAKER: We present the case of a robot-assisted total posterior arthroplasty. A 66-year-old female presented to the clinic with 6 months of worsening low back pain with symptoms of neurogenic claudication, characterized by throbbing pain along the posterior and lateral aspects of both legs, exacerbated by ambulation and standing. The pain was at an 8 out of 10 at its worst. Lying down and extending her legs worsened than the pain.
SPEAKER: Leaning forward or sitting down improved the pain. The patient did not have any weakness, paresthesias, or bowel or bladder symptoms. She had received an interlaminar epidural steroid injection without any relief of symptoms, and had completed extensive physical therapy without improvement. The patient's motor exam showed 5 out of 5 strength to the bilateral upper and lower extremities. Her sensation was intact to light touch throughout.
SPEAKER: She had 1+ reflexes, normal for her age, throughout the bilateral upper and lower extremities without Hoffmann's or clonus. She had an antalgic gait. The rest of her neurologic exam was unremarkable. Here, we are looking at the T2-weighted sequence on the preoperative MRI of the lumbar spine showing severe canal stenosis at L4–5 with bilateral, lateral recess stenosis, mild neuroforaminal stenosis, and severe facet joint effusions.
SPEAKER: This preoperative CT was obtained with thin cuts to evaluate the bony anatomy, which better demonstrates the aforementioned facet hypertrophy at L4–5. The thin cuts of this CT allow it to be uploaded to the robot to allow for preplanning of screws and to eliminate the need for an intraoperative CT for navigation.
SPEAKER: We then review the preoperative lumbar spine x-rays that demonstrate a stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis of L4 over L5. The management of lumbar stenosis has both nonoperative and operative options. Nonoperative options for this patient included extensive physical therapy and epidural steroid injections, neither of which provided the patient with long-lasting symptom relief.
SPEAKER: Surgical options include laminectomy alone, posterior lumbar fusion with or without interbody fusion, and lumbar arthroplasty. Performing a laminectomy in the setting of the patient's severe facet arthropathy and grade 1 spondylolisthesis could lead to postoperative instability, leading to worsening back pain and the possible need for fusion in the future. Performing a posterior lumbar fusion, with or without interbody fusion, would eliminate motion across the fused segments, increasing the risk of adjacent segment disease, which may necessitate further surgical intervention in the future.
SPEAKER: Our patient is young and active with a stable spondylolisthesis, so we did not feel that a fusion was in her best interest. This leaves us with an arthroplasty. This would allow for us to perform a wide laminectomy and bilateral foraminotomies while avoiding fusion, but still providing stability. The arthroplasty preserves range of motion, decreases the risk of development of adjacent segment disease, and thus the need for further surgical intervention.
SPEAKER: After detailed discussion with the patient, the decision was made to proceed with lumbar arthroplasty using the TOPS, Total Posterior Spine system. We utilize robotic guidance to assist with screw planning and placement. The TOPS system is a mechanical device installed between the vertebrae after decompression. It functions as a mobile joint, maintaining flexion and extension that is typically restricted by traditional spinal fusion.
SPEAKER: The device aims to reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration and deliver superior clinical outcomes in terms of pain relief and functional mobility compared to spinal fusion. Using a robot allows us to preplan the screw depth on the preoperative CT scan, allowing for optimal placement of the TOPS motion implant. Following the plan intraoperatively ensures that the TOPS motion implant settles into the tulip heads without the need for further adjustment, resulting in shorter operative times.
SPEAKER: Additionally, this can help in avoiding the potential need to convert to fusion due to misalignment of the TOPS with the tulip heads. We now turn our attention to the surgery. The patient was positioned prone on a Jackson table with all pressure points padded. The Medtronic Mazor robotic guidance system was then docked to the bed. The surgical area was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion.
SPEAKER: The robotic arm was draped with a proprietary drape made for this specific robot. X-ray was used to plan the incision. The incision was made using a 10-blade scalpel, and Bovie cautery was used to dissect down to the spine, making sure to expose the facet joints and transverse processes bilaterally. The robot was then secured to the patient using a percutaneous pin, and the surface was mapped by the robot.
SPEAKER: The robot was then registered to the navigation system. Two x-rays were taken with a 3D marker, allowing the robot to match the preoperative surgical plan with the intraoperative anatomy. Next, we see the plan that we made prior to beginning the case and the steps taken to integrate the intraoperative X-ray to the preoperative CT scan.
SPEAKER: The integration is performed level by level, increasing accuracy. Alternatively, an intraoperative CT scan may be obtained and uploaded to the robot, after which the screws can be planned. We prefer to obtain intraoperative X-rays and match them to the preoperative CT scan, because this allows for planning of the screws preoperatively. And with our operating room workflow, is a more time-efficient option that decreases patients' time under anesthesia.
SPEAKER: The robot arm was then moved to the location of the first planned screw trajectory where a sleeve and dilator were placed onto the entry point, shielding surrounding tissue from unnecessary trauma. A high-speed drill was used to drill a pilot hole, and the tap was used under navigated guidance to prep the pedicle. Note the white target sign that signals when the navigated tap has reached the preplanned depth.
SPEAKER: These steps were repeated until all four pedicles were prepared. The screws were not placed at this time to allow for unhindered decompression. The robot arm was moved away from the surgical field, and a high-speed drill was used to perform the decompression to minimize manipulation of the spine and maintain the accuracy of the navigation. To maintain our workflow, we placed each pedicle screw under navigated guidance.
SPEAKER: Again, the robot's navigation system signals when the screw has reached the preplanned depth, allowing for optimal placement of the screws. Due to the risk of navigation becoming inaccurate after the full fecetectomies, we prefer to keep the robot arm out of the field so we can see and feel the prepared screw trajectories as we place the screws. The pedicle screws were then tested.
SPEAKER: The trial alignment gauge was secured into the tulip heads to determine the size of the implant. The TOPS motion implant was attached to the TOPS inserter and filled with saline to its filling line. It was then seated into the tulip heads where it was secured in place using set caps. The set caps were final tightened, and the TOPS inserter was detached from the TOPS motion implant.
SPEAKER: The wound was then closed in the usual fashion, and the surgery was complete. On postoperative day 0, the patient had immediate relief of her neurogenic claudication symptoms upon standing. She remained neurologically intact on exam. At 6 weeks postsurgery, the patient had resolution of all symptoms without back pain, maintained normal range of motion with all movements, and was able to go back to her normal, very active lifestyle.
SPEAKER: There are some potential complications associated with robot-assisted TOPS placement. In patients with certain body habitus, integration of X-ray to preoperative CT could prove challenging due to image quality and could lead to inaccuracies with the registration. This would then require an intraoperative CT scan followed by planning of the screws, which would lead to increased time under anesthesia.
SPEAKER: The reference array can also be bumped during the case and move. Finally, after performing a decompression with full facetectomies, navigation can become less accurate during the screw placement step. It is imperative that the screws line up craniocaudally and mediolaterally. If they do not, the TOPS device cannot be placed, and the procedure will have to be converted to a fusion due to the wide, destabilizing decompression that has been performed.
SPEAKER: With that said, the utilization of robot assistance with placement of the TOPS device has eliminated the need for intraoperative adjustments of the screws, prevented conversion to fusion, and allowed a streamlined, accurate placement of the device in our patients. We believe that the robot is a great tool and will play a positive role in the future of TOPS device placement.
SPEAKER:
Segment:0 .
[MUSIC PLAYING]
SPEAKER: We present the case of a robot-assisted total posterior arthroplasty. A 66-year-old female presented to the clinic with 6 months of worsening low back pain with symptoms of neurogenic claudication, characterized by throbbing pain along the posterior and lateral aspects of both legs, exacerbated by ambulation and standing. The pain was at an 8 out of 10 at its worst. Lying down and extending her legs worsened than the pain.
SPEAKER: Leaning forward or sitting down improved the pain. The patient did not have any weakness, paresthesias, or bowel or bladder symptoms. She had received an interlaminar epidural steroid injection without any relief of symptoms, and had completed extensive physical therapy without improvement. The patient's motor exam showed 5 out of 5 strength to the bilateral upper and lower extremities. Her sensation was intact to light touch throughout.
SPEAKER: She had 1+ reflexes, normal for her age, throughout the bilateral upper and lower extremities without Hoffmann's or clonus. She had an antalgic gait. The rest of her neurologic exam was unremarkable. Here, we are looking at the T2-weighted sequence on the preoperative MRI of the lumbar spine showing severe canal stenosis at L4–5 with bilateral, lateral recess stenosis, mild neuroforaminal stenosis, and severe facet joint effusions.
SPEAKER: This preoperative CT was obtained with thin cuts to evaluate the bony anatomy, which better demonstrates the aforementioned facet hypertrophy at L4–5. The thin cuts of this CT allow it to be uploaded to the robot to allow for preplanning of screws and to eliminate the need for an intraoperative CT for navigation.
SPEAKER: We then review the preoperative lumbar spine x-rays that demonstrate a stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis of L4 over L5. The management of lumbar stenosis has both nonoperative and operative options. Nonoperative options for this patient included extensive physical therapy and epidural steroid injections, neither of which provided the patient with long-lasting symptom relief.
SPEAKER: Surgical options include laminectomy alone, posterior lumbar fusion with or without interbody fusion, and lumbar arthroplasty. Performing a laminectomy in the setting of the patient's severe facet arthropathy and grade 1 spondylolisthesis could lead to postoperative instability, leading to worsening back pain and the possible need for fusion in the future. Performing a posterior lumbar fusion, with or without interbody fusion, would eliminate motion across the fused segments, increasing the risk of adjacent segment disease, which may necessitate further surgical intervention in the future.
SPEAKER: Our patient is young and active with a stable spondylolisthesis, so we did not feel that a fusion was in her best interest. This leaves us with an arthroplasty. This would allow for us to perform a wide laminectomy and bilateral foraminotomies while avoiding fusion, but still providing stability. The arthroplasty preserves range of motion, decreases the risk of development of adjacent segment disease, and thus the need for further surgical intervention.
SPEAKER: After detailed discussion with the patient, the decision was made to proceed with lumbar arthroplasty using the TOPS, Total Posterior Spine system. We utilize robotic guidance to assist with screw planning and placement. The TOPS system is a mechanical device installed between the vertebrae after decompression. It functions as a mobile joint, maintaining flexion and extension that is typically restricted by traditional spinal fusion.
SPEAKER: The device aims to reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration and deliver superior clinical outcomes in terms of pain relief and functional mobility compared to spinal fusion. Using a robot allows us to preplan the screw depth on the preoperative CT scan, allowing for optimal placement of the TOPS motion implant. Following the plan intraoperatively ensures that the TOPS motion implant settles into the tulip heads without the need for further adjustment, resulting in shorter operative times.
SPEAKER: Additionally, this can help in avoiding the potential need to convert to fusion due to misalignment of the TOPS with the tulip heads. We now turn our attention to the surgery. The patient was positioned prone on a Jackson table with all pressure points padded. The Medtronic Mazor robotic guidance system was then docked to the bed. The surgical area was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion.
SPEAKER: The robotic arm was draped with a proprietary drape made for this specific robot. X-ray was used to plan the incision. The incision was made using a 10-blade scalpel, and Bovie cautery was used to dissect down to the spine, making sure to expose the facet joints and transverse processes bilaterally. The robot was then secured to the patient using a percutaneous pin, and the surface was mapped by the robot.
SPEAKER: The robot was then registered to the navigation system. Two x-rays were taken with a 3D marker, allowing the robot to match the preoperative surgical plan with the intraoperative anatomy. Next, we see the plan that we made prior to beginning the case and the steps taken to integrate the intraoperative X-ray to the preoperative CT scan.
SPEAKER: The integration is performed level by level, increasing accuracy. Alternatively, an intraoperative CT scan may be obtained and uploaded to the robot, after which the screws can be planned. We prefer to obtain intraoperative X-rays and match them to the preoperative CT scan, because this allows for planning of the screws preoperatively. And with our operating room workflow, is a more time-efficient option that decreases patients' time under anesthesia.
SPEAKER: The robot arm was then moved to the location of the first planned screw trajectory where a sleeve and dilator were placed onto the entry point, shielding surrounding tissue from unnecessary trauma. A high-speed drill was used to drill a pilot hole, and the tap was used under navigated guidance to prep the pedicle. Note the white target sign that signals when the navigated tap has reached the preplanned depth.
SPEAKER: These steps were repeated until all four pedicles were prepared. The screws were not placed at this time to allow for unhindered decompression. The robot arm was moved away from the surgical field, and a high-speed drill was used to perform the decompression to minimize manipulation of the spine and maintain the accuracy of the navigation. To maintain our workflow, we placed each pedicle screw under navigated guidance.
SPEAKER: Again, the robot's navigation system signals when the screw has reached the preplanned depth, allowing for optimal placement of the screws. Due to the risk of navigation becoming inaccurate after the full fecetectomies, we prefer to keep the robot arm out of the field so we can see and feel the prepared screw trajectories as we place the screws. The pedicle screws were then tested.
SPEAKER: The trial alignment gauge was secured into the tulip heads to determine the size of the implant. The TOPS motion implant was attached to the TOPS inserter and filled with saline to its filling line. It was then seated into the tulip heads where it was secured in place using set caps. The set caps were final tightened, and the TOPS inserter was detached from the TOPS motion implant.
SPEAKER: The wound was then closed in the usual fashion, and the surgery was complete. On postoperative day 0, the patient had immediate relief of her neurogenic claudication symptoms upon standing. She remained neurologically intact on exam. At 6 weeks postsurgery, the patient had resolution of all symptoms without back pain, maintained normal range of motion with all movements, and was able to go back to her normal, very active lifestyle.
SPEAKER: There are some potential complications associated with robot-assisted TOPS placement. In patients with certain body habitus, integration of X-ray to preoperative CT could prove challenging due to image quality and could lead to inaccuracies with the registration. This would then require an intraoperative CT scan followed by planning of the screws, which would lead to increased time under anesthesia.
SPEAKER: The reference array can also be bumped during the case and move. Finally, after performing a decompression with full facetectomies, navigation can become less accurate during the screw placement step. It is imperative that the screws line up craniocaudally and mediolaterally. If they do not, the TOPS device cannot be placed, and the procedure will have to be converted to a fusion due to the wide, destabilizing decompression that has been performed.
SPEAKER: With that said, the utilization of robot assistance with placement of the TOPS device has eliminated the need for intraoperative adjustments of the screws, prevented conversion to fusion, and allowed a streamlined, accurate placement of the device in our patients. We believe that the robot is a great tool and will play a positive role in the future of TOPS device placement.
SPEAKER:
Form Title Download
Transcript
Form Title Bookmark
Entire Media
Segment(s)
Custom Clip
Start At:
End At:
Form Title Share
Entire Media
Segment(s)
Custom Clip
Start At:
End At:
Form Title Accessibility and Keyboard Shortcuts
The cadmore media player is a professional video and audio player experience designed to deliver media as well as relevant transcript, segmentation, and metadata. On the screen is a traditional html video player with buttons such as play, pause, forward, captioning, language and play speed selection and more. Adjacent to the video player are generally tabs, one of which shows a scrolling transcript of the video and the other shows any segmentation of the media, sometimes referred to as chapters. At the top of the video is a menu bar containing an Explore button and Tools button. The Explore button allows you to dig deeper into the video by opening up an explore dialog which contains tabs for a visual navigation of the video using thumbnails, an about tab which contains rich metadata about the media, a segments tab which contains further information about the video, and a related tab which contains links to other media related to this media. The tools button opens a menu with options for sharing the media on social media, creating bookmarking links, creating embed codes for your website, generating citations, and more.
Keyboard Shortcuts
Keyboard shortcuts only work while you are in forms mode. By entering forms mode, you will be able to quickly access portions of the media player with single key commands.
Spacebar: Play/Pause Toggle
I: Info Menu,
O: Tools Menu
T: Transcript Tab,
S: Segments Tab
F: Forward 15,
R: Rewind 15
L: Languages,
P: Playspeed
M: Mute Toggle,
V: Volume Bar
N: Video Only Toggle,
B: Full Screen Toggle
C: Captions Toggle
Escape: Closes dialogs and menus / Exits Player
Z: Next Transcript Chapter
X: Previous Transcript Chapter
Q: Next Transcript Paragraph
W: Previous Transcript Paragraph
Entire Media
Segment(s)
Custom Clip
Start At:
End At:
Embed Size
-
You Size - Responsive
-
We Size - Responsive
-
Picture Overlay Popup
-
400 x 225
-
512 x 288
-
400 x 700
-
768 x 1024
-
1024 x 512
-
1280 x 608
Form Title Cite
No citation provided.
Info
Segments
Related
Thumbnails
Exit Clip Mode
You have requested to see a portion of the video outside of the clip.
Click OK to switch to the full video or click if you would like to stay inside the clip. You can always go back to the clip with Tools and Clip Mode