Name:
10.3171/2024.10.FOCVID24128
Description:
10.3171/2024.10.FOCVID24128
Thumbnail URL:
https://cadmoremediastorage.blob.core.windows.net/f2fb56c8-06fa-46d4-9ee6-7622af2023d0/videoscrubberimages/Scrubber_537.jpg
Duration:
T00H11M11S
Embed URL:
https://stream.cadmore.media/player/f2fb56c8-06fa-46d4-9ee6-7622af2023d0
Content URL:
https://cadmoreoriginalmedia.blob.core.windows.net/f2fb56c8-06fa-46d4-9ee6-7622af2023d0/6. 24-128.mp4?sv=2019-02-02&sr=c&sig=rmoyp4Ki8ScSALJOyWnHka3pyjXXkHIKRUzfig%2BDFNQ%3D&st=2026-02-17T19%3A31%3A16Z&se=2026-02-17T21%3A36%3A16Z&sp=r
Upload Date:
2024-11-21T00:00:00.0000000
Transcript:
Language: EN.
Segment:0 .
[AUDIO LOGO]
SPEAKER: In this video, we are going to discuss the role of intraoperative neuropsychological testing, a novel approach, offering continuous information about a myriad of cognitive functions. Direct electrical stimulation, or DES, mapping is the go-to technique for identifying essential brain functions during surgery. This method has been invaluable in minimizing postoperative deficits, while simultaneously allowing for the removal of as much of the tumor as possible, which is a key to improving the patient survival.
SPEAKER: However, while its use is established for simpler tasks such as sensory motor functions or basic language exercises in dominant hemisphere tumors, there is an increasing focus on the preservation of higherlevel cognitive functions, especially in the subcortical regions or during surgeries in the nondominant hemisphere. When it comes to intraoperative neuropsychological testing, or IONT, we are looking at a major leap forward in how we monitor brain function during surgery.
SPEAKER: It offers a continuous stream of information on how the brain is functioning as we remove the tumor. It is analogous to having a real-time conversation with the brain where we can monitor language, visual-spatial judgment, neglect, attention, and even higher-order executive functions all at once. It also reflects the functioning of wider neural networks, providing a dynamic view of brain function as opposed to the circumscribed focus on specific language hubs.
SPEAKER: Real-time intraoperative neuropsychological testing at our program utilizes an advanced dual iPad application setup, where one iPad is positioned for the patient to view and interact with the tasks, while the other is used by the neuropsychologist to monitor and control the process. The examiner's iPad is equipped with the ability to provide an auditory signal to cue the neurosurgeon for stimulation, which is crucial because if the stimulation and presentation of the stimulus do not coincide, it could lead to incorrect interpretations. This setup also captures patient accuracy, reaction time to responses, and audio and video recordings of the patient, giving us comprehensive data to analyze later. The app also supports multiple testing paradigms, rendering it a versatile tool for assessment during resection in areas with the potential of multiple eloquent functions.
SPEAKER: In our intraoperative neuropsychological testing, we selected several tasks to utilize during mapping and neuromonitoring, including verbal and nonverbal tasks. We select the tasks based on several factors, including tumor location, baseline neuropsychological testing data, patient symptoms, and the cognitive skills most vital to the quality of life of our patients.
SPEAKER: We utilize an object naming task for mapping in this case, as it considered the gold standard for assessing language function and requires perceptual object recognition. This paradigm also effectively targets core language areas in the brain and is also simple and efficient. Its strong standardization and adaptability makes it a reliable choice across multiple clinical settings.
SPEAKER: To better illustrate the impact of IONT, we will be presenting a case where this approach played a crucial role. This case involves a 41-year-old right-handed male with a recurrent IDH-mutant ATRX-mutated right temporal astrocytoma. He initially underwent resection of the low-grade astrocytoma in 2016. Over the years, he has experienced episodes of dizziness, a rising sensation of hot flashes, and panic attacks that occurred unexpectedly.
SPEAKER: In May 2021, MR imaging showed progression of the right temporal lesion. He then underwent a near-total resection of the nonenhancing tumor. Following surgery, he received radiation therapy with concurrent temozolomide and completed 12 cycles. He denied cognitive deficits and was working full-time in a technical computer science field since the prior surgery. Recent MRIs revealed a mass-like hyperintensity in the right insula and a small enhancing nodule in the posterior insula, suggesting a high-grade transformation.
SPEAKER: As a result, we recommended re-resection. Before surgery, we first localized the somatosensory, motor, and language areas in the brain using magnetoencephalography or MEG. To assess the language areas, we use two specific paradigms. Firstly, we had the patient listen to five target words. Then whenever one of those words was repeated, the patient was asked to raise a finger if they recognize it. The second paradigm involved two tasks: object naming and word reading.
SPEAKER: These tasks were designed to engage both language perception and production areas of the brain. For the object naming task, the patient was shown a picture of an object and asked to quickly think of the noun that described this object. After the picture, a word was shown and the patient had to decide whether the word matched the picture. This task helped us identify language production areas, like Broca's area, and also areas involved in the lexical information about the language, like Wernicke's area. The word reading task, on the other hand, activated a wider network of language-related areas responsible for recognizing words, accessing their meanings, and integrating them in into a coherent understanding. Interestingly, the MEG results show a bilateral activation of the language-related areas with stronger activation on the right side during the word listening task.
SPEAKER: This finding was unusual, especially since the patient is right-handed. Because of the possibility that the critical language areas might be in the right hemisphere and the demand on nonverbal functions to his profession, we decided to move forward with a redo awake] craniotomy, including continuous real-time neuropsychological testing, to ensure the patient's safety. In our preoperative neuropsychological assessment, our goal is to set a solid baseline to guide everything in the operating room.
SPEAKER: The patient completes a traditional comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation to objectively measure global cognitive performance, as well as baseline testing to subsequently use in the operating room. The comprehensive neuropsychological pre-op assessment revealed that the patient is very high functioning, with most of his scores well above average for his age group. There were no signs of cognitive impairment or language deficits, consistent with his self-report.
SPEAKER: However, we did notice a relative weakness in visual-based learning and memory compared to verbal memory and other verbal-based functions. Based on this discrepancy, the neuropsychological test data supported that the lesion was likely located in the nondominant hemisphere and/or impacting nonverbal functions. The absence of cognitive impairment was also a good prognostic indicator that the tumor had not yet affected the crucial functional network of the brain.
SPEAKER: In terms of obtaining a baseline for use in intraoperative mapping, we looked at few key areas. First, we assessed standard language tasks like object naming, auditory comprehension, and word reading. This help us understand the patient's core language abilities. Next, we check functions related to the nondominant hemisphere. This includes tasks like line bisection and number span, which help us spot any issues with neglect or spatial orientation.
SPEAKER: We also consider the patient's quality of life. For instance, our patient was working in IT, and we included tasks related to math calculations to see how well he can handle tasks important to his job. For intraoperative testing, a 70% of accuracy is recommended as a cutoff. The items that the patient answered correctly were selected for use in intraoperative testing, and those that were wrongly answered were excluded.
SPEAKER: Here, you see the intraoperative footage showing the real-time neuropsychological assessment in action and how it helps us neurosurgeons to maximize the extent of resection safely and preserving the patient function. The surgeons give the stimulation after hearing the beep signal from the iPad and maps the brain based on the continuous feedback from the patient.
SPEAKER: [BEEPING SOUND]
PATIENT: [INAUDIBLE]
DOCTOR 1: That's correct. [BEEPING SOUND]
PATIENT: [INAUDIBLE]
DOCTOR 1: OK. That's incorrect. I'm going to skip that one.
DOCTOR 2: OK. [BEEPING SOUND]
PATIENT: [INAUDIBLE]
DOCTOR 1: It's a what?
PATIENT: [INAUDIBLE] No. Kangaroo.
DOCTOR 1: Kangaroo. Correct. Try another one there. [BEEPING SOUND]
PATIENT: [INAUDIBLE]
DOCTOR 1: That's correct. Good job. [MACHINE WHOOSHING]
PATIENT: [INAUDIBLE].
DOCTOR 1: That's incorrect. That's a semantic paraphasia.
DOCTOR 2: Yeah.
DOCTOR 1: [INAUDIBLE] no response. And then [INAUDIBLE]
PATIENT: [INAUDIBLE].
DOCTOR 1: No, it's not an elephant. We'll put that [INAUDIBLE] a little bit. Let's try this one.
PATIENT: [INAUDIBLE]
DOCTOR 1: Try this-- right.
DOCTOR 3: Can you count to 25 for me. Start at one.
PATIENT: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25.
DOCTOR 3: Very good. What color is the sky?
PATIENT: Blue.
DOCTOR 3: What color is the grass?
PATIENT: Green.
DOCTOR 3: What is 1 plus 2?
PATIENT: Three.
DOCTOR 3: Very good.
SPEAKER: Intraoperatively, we had positive simulation despite the tumor being in the nondominant hemisphere as suggested by the MEG. During the mapping session, while resecting the tumor, we administered over 70 object naming trials to the patient. We recorded 4 perceptual errors and 3 instances of mild dysarthria. In this image from the neuronavigation, you can see the point corresponding to all 4 perceptual errors that we encountered intraoperatively.
SPEAKER: Integrating intraoperative neuropsychological testing with the surgery helped us find the safest margin for resection, while ensuring the preservation of function. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to the ICU. Subsequently, he was transferred to the floor in stable condition. His postoperative course was unremarkable. He had no neurological deficits or complications.
SPEAKER: Postoperative imaging revealed postoperative changes following right temporal craniotomy and mass resection. There were no findings to suggest any residual tumor. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1. At 2 weeks postoperative neuropsychological screening, the patient was evaluated for gross cognitive and language dysfunction. He did remarkably well and had no deficits. He will undergo repeat comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation at 6 months postoperatively.
SPEAKER: In summary, IONT provides continuous cognitive monitoring during the resection of tumors located in eloquent areas and maximizes the preservation of functions and extent of resection.